Abstract
This article reports psychometric properties of a decision-support scale designed to quantify the decision-making process for allocating psychiatric care. The authors developed a scale to evaluate the level of care needed for patients requiring psychiatric treatment in a health maintenance organization (HMO) setting. This study examines the reliability and validity of that scale by measuring interrater agreement among utilization reviewers from the HMO and between those reviewers and the clinicians who evaluated the patients directly. Agreement (kappa) among the five clinical raters acting in a utilization review capacity on dimensions of the scale ranged from .71 to .98. Kappas for agreement between the treatment intensity proposed by the reviewer/rater and used by the treating clinician were .41, .38, .40, .35, .36, and .39, respectively. The scale is reliable in the hands of trained personnel. Although there were important differences between clinicians' ratings and those of utilization review raters, these differences do not suggest that use of the scale would limit patient access to care.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
