Abstract
The present study evaluated the psychometric properties of scores from the Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale Short Form (BADS-SF) in a sample of older age, spousal, Alzheimer’s caregivers participating in an evaluation of Behavioral Activation (BA) therapy compared to an Information Support (IS) group. At baseline assessment, caregivers (N = 170) completed the BADS-SF, which is comprised of two subscales (Activation and Avoidance) that can be summed to produce a total score. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to evaluate structural validity. A two-factor solution fit the data adequately; however, the first item on the scale did not load onto either factor. Internal consistency reliability for the total and subscales scores was poor as measured by Cronbach’s alpha. Construct validity was evidenced by significant expected relationships with depression. Pre- to post-intervention scores did not evidence sensitivity to change. These findings provide some support but raise important concerns about the validity and reliability of BADS-SF scores in a population of older adult caregivers.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
