Abstract
This study of serial use by academic psychologists incorporates both an analysis of psychologists' use of serials and a comparison of a list of specific journal titles read by psychologists at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUIC) to published national rankins of psychology journals. Findings related to serial use behavior are compared to a similar study of UIUC social science faculty conducted approximately a decade earlier. The study confirms the need for both qualitative and quantitative data for the evaluation of serial titles in psychology, and the value of local data in collection development decisions related to serials.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
