Abstract

The contrast between a psychological and a biological study of a superficially similar phenomenon can be illustrated with the ‘cough’. The word is used generically for an explosive expulsion of air that clears the pulmonary passages. But this common meaning is set into two radically different conceptual and empirical frameworks. Imagine you are at a concert – Yo Yo Ma is approaching one the most delicate passages in the Elgar Cello concerto and you become aware of a mounting discomfort in the chest and a well nigh irresistible pressure to cough – eventually you cannot control it any more. This is the 'cough' in a biological framework of mechanisms and concepts. Consider this case – you are at the open door of colleague’s study and you see that she is earnestly advising an undergraduate. Rather than barge in you cough discretely to attract her attention. In the first case you, the person, have lost control of a biological mechanism, while in the second case you, the person, used a biological mechanism for a psychologically intelligible purpose. In the first case the cough has no meaning. In the second case its meaning is or ought to be clear. Note too, that different cultures may have different uses for the cough, just as different cultures have different uses for the smile.

Highlights

  • Imagine you are at a concert – Yo Yo Ma is approaching one the most delicate passages in the Elgar Cello concerto and you become aware of a mounting discomfort in the chest and a well nigh irresistible pressure to cough – eventually you cannot control it any more

  • We are aiming at creating a human science that is in accordance with what physicists and chemists really do, not what a bunch of antiquated and flawed philosophers tell them they should be doing!

  • Can Wittgenstein Save Cognitive Neuroscience?. At this moment neuropsychology is dominating the generosity of the grant giving agency despite the striking criticisms of the very idea of such a project

Read more

Summary

The Puzzle of Paradigm Paralysis in Psychology Compared With Physics

Jan Valsiner’s admirable presentation of methodology for cultural psychology (Valsiner, 2007). produces a strong feeling of deja vu for those of us who were actively trying to bring psychology forwards in the 1960s and 70s. In 1905 a new physics developed in the German speaking world, by Einstein, Schrodinger, Heisenberg and many others with a very different conceptual framework. Very soon it displaced the old paradigm so much so that some of leading members of the new wave such as Paul Dirac were British. This came about despite the catastrophe that overtook Germany in the First World War. after that war despite coming out victorious Britain gradually ceased to be Top Nation. We are aiming at creating a human science that is in accordance with what physicists and chemists really do, not what a bunch of antiquated and flawed philosophers tell them they should be doing!

Can Wittgenstein Save Cognitive Neuroscience?
What Should Empirical Research Look Like?
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call