Abstract
The aesthetic implications of Law’s thought become clearer still when an analysis is made of Byrom and Law’s revaluation of traditional Enlightenment psychology. Their critique of Descartes and Locke stems from Law’s theology of Creation. In their account of the nature of man, they merely spell out the psychological implications of this theology. In his “Thoughts on the Constitution of Human Nature as Represented in the Systems of Modern Philosophers,” Byrom has perhaps Hutcheson particularly in mind; but through Hutcheson, he is attacking the sources of Enlightenment psychology, Descartes and Locke.1
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.