Abstract

This paper presents the findings of a study which investigated the extent to which female lawbreaking was attributed to psychological disturbance in written comments made by Tasmanian Criminal Court judges in passing sentence and in pre-sentence reports prepared for the Tasmanian Criminal Court. It was found that female deviance was viewed predominantly as a function of psychological disturbance and that while other factors were also relied upon to explain women's criminal conduct those factors tended to be discounted or subsumed into psychological explanations. It was also found that the evidence in support of psychological dysfunction in the cases examined was often weak or questionable. The implications of these findings are considered, in particular, the possibility that other significant aspects of the case may be ignored and that over-emphasis upon psychodynamic explanatory factors may produce a distorted view of the offenders and their behaviour.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call