Abstract

BackgroundStudies of caregiver burden and somatic illness tend to be based on relatively small, clinical samples. Longitudinal, population based studies on this topic are still scarce and little is known about the long-term impact of partner illness on spousal mental health in the general population. In this study we investigate whether spouses of partners who either have become somatically ill or cured from illness in an 11 year period - or who have long-term illness - have different mental health scores compared to spouses of healthy partners.MethodsApproximately 9000 couples with valid self-report data on a Global Mental Health (GMH) scale and somatic illness status were identified. The diagnoses stroke, angina pectoris, myocardial infarction and severe physical disability, were transformed into a dichotomous ‘any illness’-scale, and also investigated separately. Analyses of variance (ANOVA) stratified by sex were conducted with spousal GMH score at follow-up (1995–97, T2) as the outcome variable, adjusting for spousal GMH score at baseline (1984–86, T1) and several covariates.ResultsResults showed that male and female spouses whose partners had become somatically ill since T1 had significantly poorer mental health than partners in the reference category, comprising couples healthy at both time points. Further, female spouses of partners who had recovered from illness since T1 had significantly better mental health than controls. Of the somatic conditions, physical disability had the most significant contribution on spousal GMH, for both sexes, in addition to stroke on male spouses’ GMH. The effect sizes were small. Some of the loss of spousal mental health seems to be mediated by the ill persons’ psychological distress.ConclusionThe occurrence of partner illness during the follow-up period affect the mental health of spouses negatively, while partner recovery appeared to be associated with improved mental health scores for female spouses. Of the measured conditions, physical disability had the largest impact on spousal distress, but for some conditions the distress of the ill person mediated much of the loss of mental health among spouses.

Highlights

  • Primary caregivers of physically disabled or persons suffering from some kind of life-threatening or chronic disease are essential supporters of the patient

  • The analyses of the specific illness conditions showed that men who had experienced that their partners had become physically disabled from T1 to T2 reported significantly more change in distress compared to the reference group, adjusting for spousal Global Mental Health (GMH) at T1, age and education

  • The current study adds to our previous knowledge by investigating the impact of several somatic conditions on spousal mental health using a large scale population-based data material

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Primary caregivers of physically disabled or persons suffering from some kind of life-threatening or chronic disease are essential supporters of the patient. The burden of taking care of ill or disabled individuals falls increasingly upon family members in many countries, including Norway. It has long been established that taking care of a somatically ill family member can impose psychological distress and reduced subjective well-being for the caregiving family members [4,5,6,7] and more so with increasing patient disability [8]. Longitudinal, population based studies on this topic are still scarce and little is known about the long-term impact of partner illness on spousal mental health in the general population. In this study we investigate whether spouses of partners who either have become somatically ill or cured from illness in an 11 year period - or who have long-term illness - have different mental health scores compared to spouses of healthy partners

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call