Abstract

Psychological contracts have been established as an important predictor of employee attitudes, behavior, and health, but the potential antecedents of psychological contracts are not yet fully understood. Leadership is one of the contextual antecedents with a sufficiently large body of research that is suited for a meta-analysis. A meta-analysis of 93 investigations tested the relationship between leadership and psychological contracts. The results showed an overall clear positive relationship of both constructs. Specifically, several forms of leadership were found to be negatively correlated with breach and positively correlated with fulfillment. Relationships with relational and transactional contracts were not supported because of the small number of studies. The results indicate that many studies involve leader-member exchange (LMX) or breach. Future research should conduct more studies with other leadership themes, particularly emerging leadership theories, and with a focus on psychological contract contents.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.