Abstract

The number meaning of grammatically plural nouns is to some extent context sensitive. In negative sentences, plural nouns typically receive an inclusive reading referring to any number of individuals (one or many). This contrasts with their more frequent exclusive reading referring to a group of two or more individuals. The present study investigated whether a plural noun in a negative sentence is treated as inclusive immediately when it is encountered or whether this interpretation is delayed. In an experiment using a technique based on a numerical variant of the Stroop effect (Berent et al. in J Mem Lang 53:342–358, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.05.002; Patson and Warren in J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 36(3):782–789, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018783), participants counted visually presented singular and plural Polish nouns embedded in either affirmative or negative sentences. The nouns were displayed once or as two copies. Plural nouns were easier to count when they were repeated twice on the screen than when only one copy was displayed. For singular nouns this pattern was reversed and the effect was weaker. Crucially, no difference was found for plural nouns appearing in affirmative and negative sentences. This indicated that an inclusive (“one or more”) reading of plural nouns in the scope of sentential negation was not immediate. The results are in line with past research suggesting that the semantic processing of a negative sentence may proceed in two phases (Fischler et al. in Psychophysiology 20(4):400–409, 1983. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1983.tb00920.x; Kaup et al. in J Pragmat 38:1033–1050, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.09.012; Lüdtke et al. in J Cogn Neurosci 20(8):1355–1370, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.20093; Spychalska in Proceedings of the 2011 ESSLLI student session, 2011).

Highlights

  • Grammatical number allows language users to express meanings related to the numerosity of objects under discussion using systematic contrasts, like dog vs. dogs in English

  • The present study investigated whether a plural noun in a negative sentence is treated as inclusive immediately when it is encountered or whether this interpretation is delayed

  • One aspect of the distinction that has attracted relatively little attention is the question whether the inclusive reading of a plural noun in the scope of sentential negation is available already at the point when they are first encountered in the sentence or whether the inclusive reading arises from the interpretation of the sentence as a whole

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Grammatical number allows language users to express meanings related to the numerosity of objects under discussion using systematic contrasts, like dog vs. dogs in English. One aspect of the distinction that has attracted relatively little attention is the question whether the inclusive reading of a plural noun in the scope of sentential negation is available already at the point when they are first encountered in the sentence or whether the inclusive reading arises from the interpretation of the sentence as a whole. Investigating this issue is the goal of the present study.

Background
Procedure
Results
Discussion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.