Abstract

Language students tend to struggle with literature because they find psychological and socio-cultural implications embedded in literary texts difficult to understand and discuss (Kramsch, 1996). This paper suggests that psychoanalytic literary criticism may offer a reading framework that could mitigate the struggle and allow for a deeper level of personal and social exploration of literary works. The DEFT model (Defense, Expectations, Fantasy and Transformation), as one type of reader-response approach to reading that draws on the psychoanalytic framework, might make the reading of literature easier because of its potential to offer to students strategies for finding a point of entry into the text. According to DEFT, the inability to find a point of entry into a new reading may be one of the reasons for finding a literary piece difficult, for ‘disliking’ or outright rejecting it. This qualitative study shows how the DEFT approach, originally created for native speakers but thus far little researched in relationship to non-native speakers, can be used to facilitate the reading of literary works in a language course.

Highlights

  • Literature used to dominate language teaching in the first half of the twentieth century

  • Concerns were voiced that literary language could be difficult for all readers, but even more so for non-native speakers due to non-standard language use, colloquialisms and ‘loose dialogue’ (Topping, 1968)

  • It was suggested that literature be used less frequently as a tool for teaching language

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Literature used to dominate language teaching in the first half of the twentieth century. With the development of a stronger focus on linguistics in language teaching, the role of literature was seriously challenged (e.g., Topping, 1968). It was suggested that literature be used less frequently as a tool for teaching language. The place of literature in language learning has been debated in both second and foreign language teaching (e.g., Carter & Burton, 1982; Carter & Long, 1991; Hill, 1986; Kramsch, 1996; Povey, 1967; Spack, 1985; Widdowson, 1983). Though, useful pedagogical resources for teachers have been developed and used in English as foreign language teaching (e.g., Collie & Slater, 2002; Lazar, 2000)

Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call