Abstract

The use of psychoacoustic roughness as a predictor of creaky voice is reported. Roughness, a prothetic sensation elicited by rapid changes in the temporal envelop of a sound (15-300 Hz), shares qualitative similarities with a kind of phonation known as vocal fry or creakiness. When a creakiness classification made by trained linguists was used as a reference, a classifier based on an objective temporal roughness model yielded results similar to an artificial neural network-based predictor of creakiness, but the former classifier tended to produce more type I errors. We also compare the results of the roughness-based prediction with those predicted by samples of three populations who use creakiness contrastively in different degrees: Japanese (where creakiness is not systematically used for phonetic contrast), Mandarin (where creakiness is used as a secondary cue), and Vietnamese (where creakiness is used as a phonetic contrast between tones). The roughness-based classification seems to better agree with classifications made by the untrained listeners. Our findings suggest that extreme roughness values (>4 asper) in combination with local prominences on the roughness temporal profile of vocalic segments could be used for classification of creaky intervals in running speech.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call