Abstract
At this point, we have provisionally demonstrated the self-consistency of our axiomatic system. We started by stating our undefined terms, and our premises; we set up our logical machinery, we turned this logical machinery one complete revolution, and got our premises back. Further, by analyzing in detail just what our hypothetical organism learned from his encounter with the Ames trapezoidal window, we have provided a representation of ‘ sane’ behavior which can be directly compared with the perceivable structure of human experience. The next step will be extend this system so as to show the structure of the integrated social relations between human organisms. Then we shall explore the structure of ‘impaired’ subsets of Cs (‘unsane behavior’). Finally, we shall explore the mechanisms whereby a human organism can learn how to ‘complete’ his hitherto ‘impaired’ subsets of Cs.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
