Abstract

To investigate adoptees' psychiatric contact compared with non-adoptees and to clarify the related diagnoses. Observational, nationwide, register-based study, where correlations between psychiatric, demographic and socioeconomic variables were analyzed for adoptees compared with non-adoptees. The study period is 1992-2008. The setting is Denmark, encompassing seven different types of adoptees registered from 1988 to 2005 (n = 13,524). The non-adoptees (n = 839,989) are matched on sex, age and residence. Various comparison models are designed: one with delayed entries (17 years) shows a 5.0% psychiatric contact prevalence for non-adoptees and 9.2% for adoptees (adjusted odds ratio: 2.91). Another design without delayed entries (2 years) shows a 2% prevalence for non-adoptees and 3.9% for adoptees (adjusted odds ratio 2.65). p-values <0.0005. Only one type of adoptee: ''registered partner's adoption of the other partner's child'' has a lower risk than non-adoptees (odds ratio: 0.26). Comparison within the same birth region shows a significant increased risk for most adoption types. More adoptees than non-adoptees have more than one contact. Age at adoption is an additional risk factor for4one year only. The most frequent diagnosis is ''Inherent or acquired brain suffering'' (ICD-10: F50 - F99). The results stress that ''adoptee'' is an independent risk factor for psychiatric contact for international as well as for Danish adoptees. Danish stepchildren have a higher risk than non-adopted Danish children, while ''registered partner's child adopted by the other partner'' have a lower risk than non-adopted Danish children.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.