Abstract

This cross-sectional study examines the prevalence of mental health disorders and substance use among professional staff members at community social service agencies 1 year after a mass shooting in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Highlights

  • The past 3 years have seen a record number of mass shootings that have long-lasting consequences for survivors, victims’ families, and those who address the aftermath of the shooting.[1,2] There is increased awareness of the prevalence and persistence of traumatic stress for first responders and health care professionals responding to mass casualty events.[3,4] Typically, secondary or vicarious trauma is assessed with practitioners working directly with people experiencing a traumatic event.[5]

  • Mental health measures included screens for depression, suicidal ideation, generalized anxiety disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, alcohol misuse, marijuana use, and drug use for nonmedical reasons

  • A 1-sided Pearson χ2 test was used to test primary work role differences in reports of positive screens, and statistical significance was set at P

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The past 3 years have seen a record number of mass shootings that have long-lasting consequences for survivors, victims’ families, and those who address the aftermath of the shooting.[1,2] There is increased awareness of the prevalence and persistence of traumatic stress for first responders and health care professionals responding to mass casualty events.[3,4] Typically, secondary or vicarious trauma is assessed with practitioners working directly with people experiencing a traumatic event.[5] There is scant research on the mental health well-being of professional staff at social service agencies embedded in the impacted communities. Staff may provide immediate and ongoing social and educational services either directly or indirectly to families, survivors, and the broader community after a mass casualty event. We describe the prevalence of positive screens for mental health disorders and substance use among employees and examine differences among staff working directly with the community, senior-level administrators, and support staff

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.