Abstract
There is a large and conflicting literature on the frequency and nature of psychiatric disorders in women with gynaecological conditions. It is difficult to interpret and compare the findings of different studies, largely because they have used non-standardised methods of case-identification. The aim of this paper is to illustrate the use of standardised methods of case detection in two gynaecological populations: women undergoing hysterectomy and those receiving elective tubal sterilisation. Three applications of case-identification techniques are described: measuring prevalence; describing features of the disorders; and testing hypotheses. Examples of each are given for the two gynaecological populations.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
