PSXII-11 Impact of pre-breeding and breeding supplementation in May-born range heifers on growth rates and reproductive performance

Abstract

Abstract Our objectives were to determine the impact rumen undegradable protein (RUP) supplementation prior to and during the breeding season had on growth rates and reproductive performance in May-born yearling range heifers. This study was conducted over a 3-yr period at the University of Nebraska, Gudmundsen Sandhills Laboratory (GSL) near Whitman, NE and utilized May-born Red Angus x Simmental crossbred heifers [n = 192; weaning body weight (BW) = 200 kg ± 28 kg]. Heifers were randomly assigned by pre-breeding BW to one of two treatments: 1) received 0.908 kg of a dried distillers grain supplement (DDGS; Supp, n = 66) pre-breeding through the breeding season or 2) received no supplement (NoSupp, n = 138). Each year, treatments were initiated in July and ended in August (55 ± 3 d). Using a C-Lock Smart Feeder (Rapid City, SD) heifers had individual access to their allotted DDGS supplementation. On average, NoSupp heifers consumed 0.09 kg/d (yr 1) and 0.02 kg/d (yr 2 and 3); whereas, Supp heifers averaged 0.59, 0.74, and 0.76 kg/d in yr 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Heifer BW was collected pre-trial (May), pre-breeding (July), breeding (August), pregnancy diagnosis (October), and pre-calving (April). Body condition score (BCS) was collected at pregnancy diagnosis (October) and pre-calving (April; Yr 1 and 2). Before each breeding season, two blood samples were collected 10 d apart to determine pubertal status. Heifers were synchronized with a single 5 mL intramuscular injection of prostaglandin F2 alpha (Lutalyse, Zoetis, Parsippany, NJ) 5 d after bull turnout during a 30 d natural service breeding season. Pregnancy diagnosis was determined via rectal ultrasound in October. No differences (P > 0.12) in BW were noted among treatments for all measurement timepoints. Moreover, SUPP heifers had greater (P < 0.02) average daily gain (ADG) from pre- trial to pregnancy diagnosis compared with NoSUPP heifers. However, there was no differences (P = 0.11) in ADG from pregnancy diagnosis to pre- calving. At pregnancy diagnosis (October), a treatment x year interaction (P = 0.02) for BCS was present where Supp heifers had a greater BCS than NoSupp heifers in yr 3. Heifer BCS pre-calving was not affected (P = 0.12) by treatment. There was a greater percentage (P < 0.01) of SUPP heifers cycling compared with NoSUPP heifers. However, there were no differences (P > 0.24) in pregnancy rates, the percentage that calved in the first 21 d, calf birth BW, or subsequent calving date. Ultimately, this study implies that providing a RUP supplement prior to and during the breeding season will increase the percentage of heifers that are cycling before breeding and have a greater ADG through pregnancy diagnosis; however, supplementation will not impact other reproductive parameters or BW gains.