PSIX-19 Effect of protein and starch level on N balance and ruminal fermentation parameters in steers consuming low-quality forage: Bos taurus taurus

Abstract

Abstract Globally cattle convert low-quality forage to beef and milk; therefore, understanding protein utilization in Bos taurus taurus is critical to enhancing sustainability as over and under-supplementation of protein are economically and environmentally costly. Low-quality forage lacks the N necessary for proper utilization and metabolic function. Supplemental protein improves low-quality forage utilization and is expected to increase N absorption and retention. Supplement starch can increase volatile fatty acid (VFA) production and energy supplied to the animal; however, too much starch decreases ruminally available N and pH potentially decreasing fibrolytic activity. Accordingly, our objective was to determine the effect starch supplementation on N balance and ruminal fermentation parameters in Bos taurus steers. Ruminally cannulated Angus steers [n = 5; body weight (BW) = 375 ± 45 kg] were used in a 4 × 4 Latin square to evaluate the effect of decreasing supplemental starch when consuming King Ranch Bluestem hay (3.5% CP, 73% NDF). Steers received four isonitrogenous (130 mg N/kg BW) supplements providing increasing levels of starch (2% starch = 100% soybean meal; 20% starch = 26.3% corn, 73% soybean meal, 0.7% urea; 38% starch = 51.6% corn, 47% soybean meal, 1.4% urea; 56% starch = 78.6% corn, 19% soybean meal, 2.4% urea). Five 14-d periods were conducted, consisting of 9 d adaptation and 4 d to measure intake and digestion, and 1 d for ruminal fermentation. Supplemental N intake decreased linearly (P < 0.01) with increasing starch as the crude protein content of the soybean was underestimated. Forage and total N intake were not affected by starch level (P ≥ 0.17). Fecal and total urinary N excretion were not different between starch levels (P ≥ 0.43). Urinary ammonia-N and urea-N averaged 6.6 and 16.8% of total urinary N excretion, respectively, but no differences between starch levels were observed (P ≥ 0.39). Level of starch supplementation had no effect on N retention and absorption (P ≥ 0.50). There was a treatment × time interaction observed for ruminal ammonia concentration (P < 0.01). All treatments, except 2% starch, peaked at 4 h post feeding, 20 and 38% treatments gradually decreased following four, but the concentration of ruminal ammonia decreased by 80% between 4 h and 8 h after feeding in the 56% starch treatment. Starch level had no effect total VFA concentration, VFA molar proportions, or ruminal pH (P ≥ 0.10). In conclusion, providing supplemental starch did not affect N balance or VFA production when fed to steers consuming low-quality forage. Nitrogen balance and VFA production likely were not affected because all supplements provided sufficient ruminally available N and, therefore, exerted minimal effects on forage utilization.