PSIII-29 A Novel Direct-Fed Microbial Supports in Vitro Intestinal Integrity Under Inflamed Conditions

Abstract

Abstract Ruminants are often exposed to pathogenic and non-pathogenic challenges during daily handling procedures and management activities. These responses, in turn, may trigger the release of pro-inflammatory compounds that can have negative effects on the host. Based on this rationale, we hypothesized that 1) pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α and IFN-γ) would compromise the in vitro gut barrier integrity, and 2) a novel direct-fed microbial (DFM) formulation would support the gut barrier integrity under inflammatory conditions. Therefore, our objective was to evaluate the ability of a novel DFM mixture to support barrier integrity of intestinal epithelial cell monolayers in the absence or presence of TNF-α and IFN-γ by measuring transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER). Human cancer-derived epithelial intestinal Caco-2 cell monolayers were seeded on transwells for approximately 20 days. A DFM mixture containing Lactobacillus animalis, Propionibacterium freudenreichii, Bacillus licheniformis, and B. subtilis (BOVAMINE DEFEND Plus; Chr. Hansen A/S, Hørsholm, Denmark) at 1.0 × 108 CFU/transwell was then administered to the apical side of the cell monolayers. Then, two hours later a cocktail containing TNF-α / IFN-γ at a 10:1 ratio (100:10 ng/mL, respectively) was added to the basolateral side after which TEER was measured over a 16-h period and used to calculate the area under the curve (AUC). Following the administration of the pro-inflammatory challenge, TEER was decreased, reaching its least concentrations at 5.5 h post-challenge, whereas overall AUC decreased by 21.4% compared with non-challenged control cells. The DFM mixture by itself was able to support the integrity of the intestinal cells by stimulating TEER increase over time and increasing overall AUC vs. non-treated cells (P < 0.01). Moreover, when cells receiving the DFM were challenged with the pro-inflammatory cocktail, TEER concentrations were still above 100% and no decrease was observed over the evaluation period (16 h). Moreover, when compared with non-DFM-treated but challenged cells, AUC was greater for DFM vs. challenged control cells (P < 0.05). In conclusion, these data support our hypothesis that a DFM mixture containing L. animalis, P. freudenreichii, B. licheniformis, and B. subtilis (BOVAMINE DEFEND Plus) supports the gut barrier integrity with or without the pro-inflammatory challenge.