PSI-13 Amino acid profile of GuarPro F-81, a potential protein source for swine and other agricultural animals in the United States

Abstract

Abstract Feed is the most expensive component in raising agricultural animals such as pigs in the United States Guar meal is the main by-product from the guar gum production from guar (Cyamopsis tetragonoba) seed. Although said to be unpalatable and possibly toxic, the recently improved products possess promise to be alternative protein-providing feedstuffs for animal industries, primarily because they contain great amounts of protein and are inexpensive. This study was conducted to mainly evaluate the amino acid profile of GuarPro F-81, a newly developed guar meal product in India. Three samples were randomly collected from a production company in India and aliquoted to multiple sub-samples (20 to 200 g/sub-sample), after received, for nutrient evaluation in 2 to 7 laboratories. Results showed that GuarPro F-81 contained (as-fed basis, ±SD) 97.1 ± 1.92% dry matter (n = 7), 57.9 ± 1.29% crude protein (n = 7), 7.17 ± 0.38% crude fat (n = 5), 3.24 ± 1.06% crude fiber (n = 4), 4,440 ± 622 kcal/kg gross energy (n = 2), and 5.40 ± 0.43% ash (n = 5). The amino acid contents (as-fed basis, ±SD, n = 3) were 2.30 ± 0.102% lysine, 0.61 ± 0.032% methionine, 0.68 ± 0.029% cysteine, 1.57 ± 0.009% threonine, 0.80 ± 0.048% tryptophan, 7.43 ± 0.149% arginine, 3.10 ± 0.064% leucine, 1.70 ± 0.095% isoleucine, 1.99 ± 0.073% valine, 1.42 ± 0.075% histidine, 2.14 ± 0.030% phenylalanine, 1.53 ± 0.352% tyrosine, 2.79 ± 0.027% glycine, 2.40 ± 0.190% serine, 1.85 ± 0.108% proline, 2.04 ± 0.015% alanine, 11.14 ± 0.268% glutamic acid, and 5.53 ± 0.096% aspartic acid. While the contents of alanine, cysteine, tyrosine, methionine, valine, phenylalanine, leucine, threonine, isoleucine, lysine, and proline were approximately 0.9 to 27% less than that in soybean meal (a dehulled, solvent extracted product), the contents of serine, aspartic acid, histidine, tryptophan, glutamic acid, glycine, and arginine were approximately 1.8 to 115% higher than those in soybean meal, and so was the crude protein content which was approximately 21.3% higher. While the crude fiber content was approximately 17% less, the crude fat and gross energy contents were approximately 372% and 4% higher than that in soybean meal, respectively.