Abstract

rAAA and uAAA was different. SVM correctly classified more uAAA (81% vs. 78% for kNN) while kNN classified more rAAA (87% vs 83% for SVM). Using the standard maximum diameter of 5.5 cm, 31.1% of the AAAs would have been misclassified (20 ruptured and 36 unruptured). The ruptured and unruptured AAA features tended to group together, with the most predictive features forming clusters. The ten most predictive features, given by the 2 test, were: skewness of Gaussian curvature distribution, tortuosity, non-fusiform index, minimum Mean curvature, L2 norm of Mean curvature, wall surface area, L2 norm of Gaussian curvature, isoperimetric ratio, length, and the maximum diameter. Conclusions: SVM and kNN classified more AAA correctly than a maximum diameter of 5.5 cm, indicating that maximum diameter alone is not sufficient for predicting AAA rupture risk compared to a robust geometry quantification approach.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.