Abstract
Abstract Background Neoadjuvant treatment of esophageal cancer is world accepted since 2012 (1), showing benefits in long-term survival. However, there is still controversy relating to potential complications with the use of antineoplastic drugs and radiotherapy, notably because of the higher incidence of cervical esophageal leak. Our study describes a five-year experience in anastomotic leaks in esophagectomies after neoadjuvant therapy in a southern Brazilian referral center. Methods We have analyzed all patients submitted to the combined treatment of neoadjuvant therapy plus esophagectomy between 2012–2016, including patients with squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. We describe the number of patients that experienced anastomotic leak after surgery. The diagnosis of an anastomotic leak is based in any quantity of digestive secretion in the neck wound, seen on the post-operative period. It did not secrete bacteriological analysis. McKeown and transhiatal esophagectomy were used, and esophagogastric anastomosis were conducted in the cervical region. Results Between the years of 2012–2016, thirty-six patients were submitted to a combined treatment of neoadjuvant therapy plus esophagectomy. Of these patients, 20 (55%) evolved with anastomotic leaks. All of these leaks occurred in the cervical region, and were treated in a conservative way. Conclusion The incidence of anastomotic leaks was exceptionally high, regardless of the usual care. Possible causes of this high number of leaks could be related to diagnostic criterion, the patient's own characteristics, local alterations associated to the neoadjuvant treatment, the surgical technique, or even microbiological factors. New studies are necessary with the goal to determine which of these factors contributes in the most significant way, with the means to improve the results of this unpleasant esofagectomy complication. 1) VAN HAGEN, P. et al. Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal or Junctional Cancer. New England Journal Of Medicine,[s.l.], v. 366, n. 22, p.2074–2084, 31 maio 2012. New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM/MMS). http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1112088. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.