PS01.213: COMPARISON OF MANUAL VERSUS MECHANICAL INTRA-THORACIC ESOPHAGO-GASTRIC ANASTOMOSIS IN RADICAL 2-STAGE MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY FOR CANCER

Abstract

Abstract Background While in open esophagectomy a plethora of studies comparing outcomes of mechanical (circular or linear stapler) versus hand-sewn intra-thoracic anastomosis have been published, little evidence exists regarding 2-stage minimally invasive esophagectomy; In the majority of published studies the mechanical anastomosis is favored. Construction of the intra-thoracic esophago-gastric anastomosis in minimally invasive esophagectomy is the procedure's rate limiting step. We aim to present our results of hand-sewn versus mechanical anastomosis in 2-stage minimally invasive esophagectomy. Methods Data of 113 consecutive patients over a 20-month period that underwent 2-stage minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer in our institution were analyzed. Inclusion criteria included only 2-stage and only minimally invasive esophagectomies for cancer. 43 cases underwent fully minimally invasive esophagectomy and 70 had laparoscopic-assisted hybrid esophagectomy. A fully hand-sewn anastomosis with 3/0 v-lock barbed suture was formed in 38% of cases and a mechanical anastomosis with a 25mm or 28mm circular stapler was formed in 62% of cases. Comparison between anastomotic techniques was assessed through Chi-Square and Log-Rank analysis. Results Median age was 68(IQR,47–82) in manual anastomosis group and 65(IQR,31–81) in circular stapler group. Of the manual anastomosis group, 74% received neo-adjuvant treatment versus 20% of the mechanical anastomosis group. In the manual anastomosis group n = 3(6.97%) developed a leak; of these, n = 2 were stented and n = 1 was subclinical requiring no intervention. There was one sepsis-related death; 30-day mortality was 2.3%. In the mechanical anastomosis group n = 2(2,8%) developed anastomotic leak (one combined with tracheo-esophageal fistula) and both were stented and eventually resulted in mortality. 30-day mortality was 2.8%. No conduit necrosis was noticed. Anastomotic strictures requiring dilatation were seen in n = 4(9.3%) in the manual anastomosis group versus n = 5(7.1%) in the mechanical anastomosis group. No statistically significant difference was found between the groups in terms of leak (P = 0.312), stricture (P = 0.698) and mortality rate (P > 0.005). Median length of stay was 11 days (7–70) in the manual anastomosis group and 12 days (7–51) in mechanical anastomosis group. Conclusion Outcomes between manual and mechanical intra-thoracic anastomosis in minimally invasive esophagectomy show no difference within our study group. Both are equally safe and efficient, with surgeon's preference taking priority. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.