PS: Political Science and Politics Reviewers, 2006

Abstract

In 2006, PS: Political Science and Politics published myriad articles covering a vast range of topics. Symposia alone published in 2006 focused on inequality in American democracy, on the rejection of the EU Constitution, on how the law affects the actions of department chairs, on the methodology of field research in the Middle East, on voting gaps in the 2004 election, on political corruption, and on the politics of Canada. Upcoming symposia will focus on the U.S. military, on how to incorporate the politics of the Iberian Peninsula into your syllabus, on the future of state election reform, on Islamic extremism in Europe, and on the importance of congressional leadership selection. And remember, these are only the symposia. The journal's commitment to publishing articles on pedagogy and on the profession, as well as exemplary topical scholarship on a wide array of topics, calls for an equally broad stable of expert reviewers. PS cannot publish such diverse work without the outstanding work (and open-mindedness) of our peer reviewers. The peer-review process relies on the professionalism and generosity of those who contribute their time to read and evaluate the work of others. The editors of PS thank the following scholars, who served as manuscript reviewers between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2006. Very special thanks go to those scholars whose names appear in bold; they reviewed for PS in both 2005 and 2006.