Abstract

Pruning decision trees is the way to decrease their size in order to reduce classification time and improve (or at least maintain) classification accuracy. In this paper, the idea of applying different pruning methods to C-fuzzy decision trees and Cluster–context fuzzy decision trees in C-fuzzy random forest is presented. C-fuzzy random forest is a classifier which we created and we are improving. This solution is based on fuzzy random forest and uses C-fuzzy decision trees or Cluster–context fuzzy decision trees—depending on the variant. Five pruning methods were adjusted to mentioned kind of trees and examined: Reduced Error Pruning (REP), Pessimistic Error Pruning (PEP), Minimum Error Pruning (MEP), Critical Value Pruning (CVP) and Cost-Complexity Pruning. C-fuzzy random forests with unpruned trees and trees constructed using each of these pruning methods were created. The evaluation of created forests was performed on eleven discrete decision class datasets (forest with C-fuzzy decision trees) and two continuous decision class datasets (forest with Cluster–context fuzzy decision trees). The experiments on eleven different discrete decision class datasets and two continuous decision class datasets were performed to evaluate five implemented pruning methods. Our experiments show that pruning trees in C-fuzzy random forest in general reduce computation time and improve classification accuracy. Generalizing, the best classification accuracy improvement was achieved using CVP for discrete decision class problems and REP for continuous decision class datasets, but for each dataset different pruning methods work well. The method which pruned trees the most was PEP and the fastest one was MEP. However, there is no pruning method which fits the best for all datasets—the pruning method should be chosen individually according to the given problem. There are also situations where it is better to remain trees unpruned.

Highlights

  • Decision trees created during learning process are often overgrown

  • There are only presented the results achieved for the best parameter set obtained during parameter optimization process. As it can be observed in this table, for 1985 Auto Imports Database, the best result was achieved using C-fuzzy random forest with Reduced Error Pruning (REP) pruning

  • The same pruning method allowed to achieve the second result, but for C-fuzzy forest. For this dataset the results computed using all of the pruning methods were better than without using any pruning method. (The exception was Critical Value Pruning for C-fuzzy random forest.)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Decision trees created during learning process are often overgrown. They meet the problem of overfitting to the training dataset—some nodes are created to fit the single objects of this dataset and they seem to be redundant. The existence of such nodes distort the power of generalization which should characterize the classifier. It extends a classification time, which is especially important in large trees. While working with our classifier—C-fuzzy random forest—we met the same problem.

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call