Abstract

The implementation of open innovation models for R&D activities has been extensively tested by many public and private institutions by using several models; however, both lessons learned and rationale for internal decision-making have not been systematically analyzed to serve as a basis for future institutional process management improvements, which increase the success rate. The large diversity of cases, firms, sectors and open activities, and the multiple factors affecting success has made it difficult to elaborate a general framework where to extract from some policy design rules adapted to specific contexts; thus, involved firms do not have a consolidated framework to measure the effectiveness of the open innovation practices in use. Open innovation for R&D activities conducted by multinational firms is usually carried out at the international level looking for specific knowledge and complementarity of partners. One of the critical factors for success in open innovation activities is the “right selection of adequate partners”. This paper postulates that the multi-variable selection based on the previous characterization of the relationship between the firm and one potential international partner constitutes a key factor for success. In addition, the article presents a semi-quantitative approach to measure the “differences” (a metrics based on “proximity” is defined) to analyze and compare between different partners from several dimensions. The key goal is to select external partners with the “minimum distance” to the firm. The proposed selection metrics were applied to various open research projects launched with university partners in the three Latin American countries (Mexico, Chile, and Peru).

Highlights

  • The relationship between one specific firm promoting and funding one open innovation (OI) project and one external partner can be characterized by using a set of factors

  • Three pilot OI projects were defined and implemented with universities located in Mexico, Chile, and Peru respectively, in order to test the adequacy of the OI model discussed between the Contracting technology firm and the Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM)

  • The responsibility of the selection of the participating universities in those countries relied on the UPM knowledge and procedures and not in any management structures supported by the technology firm

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A. LOOKING FOR A RATIONALE The implementation of open innovation models for research and development activities by a technology-based firm has been extensively tested by many institutions through the implementation of several open model variations [1]–[3]; both rationale and lessons learned for internal decision-making have limited analysis to serve as a basis for future institutional process management improvements in such models [4]. Even when firms are institutionally committed in implementing an open innovation strategy (termed here as leading firms) they face a difficulty to measure the effectiveness of the open innovation practices in use or to set-up a continuous improvement of open innovation processes and, to learn from the experience [10]–[12]. The use of open innovation (OI) models for R&D activities [13] conducted by multinational firms are usually carried out at the international level looking for specific knowledge

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call