Proximal row carpectomy versus four-corner arthrodesis in the treatment of SLAC and SNAC wrist: meta-analysis and literature review

Abstract

A systematic literature review was performed on 84 articles from 2000 to 2020 on proximal row carpectomy (PRC) or four-corner arthrodesis (FCA) in patients with posttraumatic wrist osteoarthritis. Qualitative assessment was conducted on 14 articles. Pain, range of motion (ROM), grip strength and complications were analyzed using weighted average means. Meta-analysis with a random effects model was performed for the flexion-extension arc and grip strength. A total of 1,066 PRCs and 2,771 FCAs were analyzed, with a mean follow-up of 9 and 7 years respectively. Mean flexion after PRC and FCA respectively was 36.2 ° and 31.1 °, mean extension 41.4 ° and 32.4 °, and mean grip strength 26.4 kg and 27.5 kg. PRC had a larger flexion-extension arc than FCA, with a standard mean difference (SMD) of 0.41 (range, 0.02−0.81). No significant difference was found for grip strength. Osteoarthritis occurred in 42.2% of PRC cases, independently of capitate shape. Conversion to wrist arthrodesis was performed in 10.1% of failed PRCs. Revision was chosen in 4.7% of FCAs and conversion to wrist arthrodesis in 4.6%. We conclude that the functional results of both techniques are similar, but prefer PRC to FCA because of the lower complications rate.