Abstract
This report suggests that complication rates may be lower in proximal humeral fractures treated with locking nail rather than locking plate groups. Fracture union was similar in both groups, and functional scores, measured by the Constant-Murley shoulder score, were not statistically different between groups. Additional studies with stronger methods and adequate power should be performed to substantiate these findings and provide more definitive evidence regarding differences between locking nails and locking plates in treating proximal humeral fractures.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
