Proximal gastric cancer—time for organ-sparing approach?

Abstract

IntroductionA steady increase in gastroesophageal junction and proximal gastric cancer (GC) incidence has been observed in the West. Given recent advances in neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), we sought to characterize short- and long-term outcomes of patients with proximal GC who underwent total (TG) versus proximal gastrectomy (PG). MethodsPatients with stage II/III proximal GC who underwent curative intent treatment between 2009 and 2019 were identified using National Cancer Database (NCDB). Multivariable analysis was used to identify oncological outcomes following TG versus PG. ResultsAmong 7,616 patients with GC who underwent surgical resection, PG and TG were performed on 5,246 (68.8%) and 2,370 (31.2%) patients, respectively. Patients who underwent PG were more likely to receive NAC (TG: 52.3% vs. PG: 64.5%)(p<0.001). On pathologic analysis, patients who underwent TG were more likely to have pT4 tumors (TG: 11.7% vs. PG: 3.1%), metastatic lymph nodes (TG: 64.6% vs. PG: 60.4%), and >16 lymph nodes evaluated (TG: 64.1% vs. PG: 53.1%), yet a lower likelihood of negative resection margins (TG: 86.6% vs. PG: 90.0%)(all p<0.001). While gastrectomy procedure type did not impact long-term survival, receipt of NAC was associated with OS among patients who underwent TG (5-year OS, NAC: 43.5% vs. no NAC: 24.6%) and PG (5-year OS, NAC: 43.1% vs. no NAC: 26.7%)(both p<0.001). ConclusionsPG may be an alternative surgical approach to TG in well-selected patients with proximal GC after administration of preoperative systemic chemotherapy.