Abstract

Mussel culture largely depends on seed and feed from the natural environment. This paper focusses on seed provisioning and efficient use of these resources in mussel production. Approaches and technologies for seed supply and efficient use of seed in mussel production are described for the different culture techniques. This includes potential interactions and conflicts with the natural environment. Three methods are used to provide seed: wild harvest, use of suspended collectors and hatchery production. Harvest of wild seed from seaweed (in New Zealand) or natural beds is still a major source for culture in some areas, costs are low but provisioning is often unreliable. Most research concerning spat collection deals with comparison of different types of suspended collectors, settlement cues and problems with biofouling. Hatchery seed is more expensive, but hatcheries provide the opportunity for selective breeding and triploid production giving the product an added value. The challenge is to bring hatchery production costs more in line with the actual sale value of mussel seed. Monitoring genetic diversity can give insight in whether collector seed or hatchery seed growth and survival is negatively affected by reduced diversity. Grow-out occurs in bottom culture, bouchot culture and off-bottom longline and raft culture. In bottom-culture, the focus is on developing better seeding techniques, predator control and optimizing culture practices such as timing of relay, substrate use and harvest. For bouchot culture, technical developments are directed to mechanical methods to increase efficiency in size grading, restocking, harvesting and processing. Innovation in growing-out techniques for longline and raft culture are directed towards the investigation of optimal stocking densities, and on material type and configuration of farms. Production efficiency increases from bottom culture to bouchot culture, to rope and raft culture and are related to the sources of mortality and differences in growth rate. Growth rate of mussels is higher in off bottom culture than in on bottom culture and higher when submerged than in intertidal. Mussels from the Perna genus are found to have a higher growth rate but a lower production efficiency than mussels from the Mytilus genus. Efficient use of seed in mussel culture should aim at a reduction of mussel losses and an increase in growth rates. Important tools are adjusting seeding densities in relation to system design, reducing seeding stress, predator control and applying thinning out or relay.

Highlights

  • Mussel culture largely depends on seed and feed from the natural environment

  • Mussel culture is based on seed and nourishment from the natural environment

  • High yields are reached because the culture starts with small seeds which increase in weight tenfold when they are thinned out and the mussel seed is re-socked in a lower density over three new ropes (Pérez Camacho et al 1991)

Read more

Summary

Mussel Aquaculture Production

Mussels are found in large quantities in coastal areas all around the world. Mussels, often organized in patches or in beds, are collected and have been an important protein source (an ecosystem good) for mankind since prehistoric times (Erlandson 1988). All that is needed is protection against dislodgement, by using sheltered sites or attachment substrate and protection against predation, supply of oxygen and seston, which is sufficient in most coastal environments. Mussel culture is based on seed and nourishment from the natural environment. The main mussel producing countries are China in Asia, Spain in Europe, Chile in the Americas, New Zealand in Oceania and South Africa in Africa (Table 3.1). Production in China, Chile and New Zealand started in the seventies of the last century and showed a rapid increase (Fig. 3.1). This levelled off for New Zealand around 2005 and continues to increase in China. In Chile production declined fast around 2011, mainly due to problems with toxic algae (Reguera et al 2014)

Culture Techniques and Innovations
Bottom Culture
Bouchot Culture
Raft and Longline Culture
Efficient Use
Stocking Density
Relaying and Thinning Out
Predator Control
Other Loss Factors
Differences in Efficiency Between Species and Culture Methods
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call