Abstract

The standard argument for the Lorentz invariance of the thermodynamic entropy in equilibrium is based on the assumption that it is possible to perform an adiabatic transformation whose only outcome is to accelerate a macroscopic body, keeping its rest mass unchanged. The validity of this assumption constitutes the very foundation of relativistic thermodynamics and needs to be tested in greater detail. We show that, indeed, such a transformation is always possible, at least in principle. The only two assumptions invoked in the proof are that there is at least one inertial reference frame in which the second law of thermodynamics is valid and that the microscopic theory describing the internal dynamics of the body is a field theory, with Lorentz invariant Lagrangian density. The proof makes no reference to the connection between entropy and probabilities and is valid both within classical and quantum physics. To avoid any risk of circular reasoning, we do not postulate that the laws of thermodynamics are the same in every reference frame, but we obtain this fact as a direct consequence of the Lorentz invariance of the entropy.

Highlights

  • The total thermodynamic entropy S, in equilibrium, must be Lorentz invariant

  • Foundations of Physics (2022) 52:11 probabilities, which are supposed to have an invariant nature [10, 11]. When it comes to proving rigorously, from first principles, that the thermodynamic entropy must necessarily be a scalar, some conceptual problems arise and it is easy to fall into circular reasoning

  • Motivated by the complication outlined in the previous subsection, we need to make an argument for the Lorentz invariance of the entropy which does not build on the assumption that the second law of thermodynamics is valid for every observer

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The total thermodynamic entropy S, in equilibrium, must be Lorentz invariant. Whether we identify S with the Boltzmann entropy [1, 2], or with the Gibbs/Shannon entropy [3, 4], or with the von Neumann entropy [5, 6], its Lorentz invariance seems inescapable. This fact is a foundational feature of relativistic fluid dynamics [7, 8] and of thermal quantum field theory [9]. The invariance of the entropy with respect to Lorentz transformations is usually justified by invoking its statistical connection with microscopic

11 Page 2 of 22
Must the Laws of Thermodynamics be the Same in Every Reference Frame?
11 Page 4 of 22
The Assumptions of the Argument
Van Kampen’s Argument
11 Page 6 of 22
Reversible Accelerations
Small Kicks
Infinite Infinitesimal Kicks
Classical Case
11 Page 10 of 22
Quantum Case
Variation of the Mass Induced by a Kick
The Mass Spectrum of a Finite Body
11 Page 12 of 22
Kicking Mass Eigenstates
Kicking Thermal States
Conclusions
11 Page 18 of 22
11 Page 20 of 22
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.