Abstract
This study aims to analyze the application of law in UURI No. 8 of 2010 concerning the Prevention and Eradication of Money Laundering Crimes in proving predicate crimes. The research was carried out using normative juridical research methods using statutory and case approaches. The results of the study show that in the application of Article 69 to the crime of money laundering in the decision, namely Decision Number 43/Pid.Sus/2017/PN.Bir with the defendant Murtala Ilyas Bin Ilyas, has used Article 69 because there was no previous decision related to the predicate crime. As for some of the obstacles experienced in the application of Article 69, namely the potential for the accused to be free from legal bondage, the lack of certain facilities and amenities, and the potential for violating the principle of the presumption of innocence.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
