Abstract
In Kenya, a week hardly passes without a report in the local press of death or destruction of property by wildlife, or retaliatory attacks on wild animals by their victims. The result is that local communities in Kenya view wildlife as a liability instead of a heritage. In such circumstances, elephants will have increasing difficulty surviving in areas of rapidly growing human populations. This is of concern since the majority of people live in rural areas where subsistence farming is their main source of livelihood. Besides, these people constitute a significant segment of the electorate. The solution to this problem lies, not in blaming the people or the elephants, but in finding the means by which the damage caused by these animals can be redressed. There is a need, therefore, to protect the elephant from harm by people, while at the same time giving priority to human needs and concerns. A practical approach to this problem is through the operation of fair and effective compensation. The mere payment of compensation, however, may not be a solution to the human-elephant conflict but it may reduce retaliatory attacks on elephants by humans. Key words: Compensation, wildlife damage, human-elephant conflict, elephant menace Journal of Social Development in Africa Vol.20(1) 2005: 7-39
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.