Abstract

In order to meet the increasing demand to decarbonize the atmosphere, storage of CO2 in subsurface geological reservoirs is an effective measure. To maximize storage capacity, various types of saline aquifers should be considered including dynamic storage options with open or semi-open boundaries. In sloping aquifers, assessment of immobilization potential for CO2 through dissolution and mineralization along the flow path is a crucial part of risk evaluations. The Gassum Formation in Skagerrak is considered a nearshore CO2 storage option with layers shallowing northwards. In this study, petrographic data and provenance analysis provide the basis for estimating reactivity of the sandstones with respect to CO2 immobilization potential. These analyses are integrated with seismic interpretation, well-log analysis and sedimentological observations of sedimentary facies to estimate mineral distribution and corresponding reactivity in the proposed injection area. Here the Gassum Formation comprises south-prograding, shoreface-fluvial para-sequences, sourced from northern hinterlands. Pronounced differences in the mineralogical maturity in the studied area are identified and explained by the sediment transport distances and the type of sediment source. This is possible because the U-Pb ages of zircon grains in the sediments can be used to pinpoint the areas where they originate from in the Fennoscandian Shield, such as Telemarkia (gneissic) or Idefjorden (granitic) terranes. Of special importance are the most reactive mineral phases like albite and Fe-rich chlorite, of which the feldspar occurs in largest abundance and the grain-coating chlorite has largest surface area. Their distribution is partly controlled by provenance, so their abundance decreases basinwards with increasing sediment maturity. The abundance of fluvial sandstones presumably increases northwards in basal parts of para-sequences, while shoreface sandstones comprise the top part of sandy units. CO2 injected in the proposed area will migrate upwards within the reservoir and up-dip along the seal, towards more immature sediments (i.e. higher contents of albite and chlorite) and higher proportions of Telemarkian-derived sediment. Thus, the mineralization potential increases along the migration path, while kinetic reaction rates will decrease in shallower, lower temperature regions. Identifying these parameters is important to estimate the CO2 mineral sequestration potential and ensure safe storage of CO2.

Highlights

  • Subsurface, brine-saturated sandstone reservoirs hold great potential for safe storage of anthropogenic CO2

  • In the Norwegian area, the Gassum Formation has only been drilled in the Farsund Basin by the 13/1-U-1 well, whereas the 13/1-U-2 and 13/2-U-2 wells did not reach the formation so no well logs exist from the northern part of the study area

  • This means that the deep erosion that occurred in southern Norway and southwestern Sweden during the Triassic has probably removed the majority of the Paleozoic sediment cover prior to the deposition of the Gassum Formation (Rohrman et al, 1995; Japsen et al, 2016)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Subsurface, brine-saturated sandstone reservoirs hold great potential for safe storage of anthropogenic CO2. In Scandinavia, the offshore storage potential is huge (Halland et al, 2011; Bergmo et al, 2013; Anthonsen et al, 2014), but under-utilized with only two operating storage sites (Eiken et al, 2011). Thorough geological reservoir characterization is essential in risk evaluations where the reservoir volume and seal quality must be taken into account, and the dissolution capacity and reactivity of the reservoir rocks such that the mineral sequestration potential can be estimated. Reactive minerals can ensure the largest amount of CO2 carbonatization and the dependence of the mineral sequestration potential on the sediment provenance has largely been overlooked hitherto. The provenance and sediment transport may strongly influence the distribution of the most reactive minerals, which is investigated in this study

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.