Provenance and paleogeography of Archean Fig Tree siliciclastic rocks in the East-Central Barberton Greenstone Belt, South Africa

Abstract

The 3.6–3.2 Ga Barberton Greenstone Belt, South Africa, is a complex terrain divided into multiple structural blocks. The structural deformation and poor geochronological constraints often make correlation among blocks difficult. To overcome structural complexities, provenance proxies including sandstone petrography, shale geochemistry, and detrital zircon geochronology are here used to compare source terrain signatures among multiple structural blocks in the East-Central Domain of the Barberton Greenstone Belt. This will expand our understanding of Paleoarchean paleogeography and the nature of crustal uplift in the southeastern part of the Barberton Greenstone Belt.The Manzimnyama and Mlumati Synclines are composed of 600 m-thick sections of the Fig Tree Group, Mapepe Formation. These synclines have high sedimentary and volcanic lithic contents in sandstones, an upward transition from felsic to mafic signatures in shales, and a detrital zircon age distribution transition from a basal member with a main peak at 3.28 Ga to members with a peak at about 3.45 Ga. There are three other East-Central Domain, fault-bounded blocks made up mostly of Mapepe Formation strata. The Eastern Barite Valley lies northwest of the Manzimnyama Syncline. From older to younger strata, the Eastern Barite Valley progresses from high lithics to more quartz and feldspar in sandstones, from more mafic to felsic signatures in shales, and from a unimodal 3.45 Ga detrital zircon signature at the base to complexly mixed age distributions with a strong 3.24 Ga peak at the top. The Paulus Syncline, southeast of the Manzimnyama Syncline, has a high chert content, mafic to ultramafic geochemistry signatures, and a main detrital zircon peak at 3.28–3.30 Ga with a minor peak at 3.45 Ga. The Emlembe Syncline, southeast of the Paulus Syncline, has a high monocrystalline quartz content, mixed geochemistry signatures, and unimodal 3.28–3.30 Ga detrital zircon ages. The proximity and sedimentology of these structural blocks could suggest deposition in a single basin; however, contrasts in provenance suggests sediments were deposited in different basins, at different times, or in one basin with provenance partitioning. The blocks likely had locally different sources, implying the sequences were not part of a single large source, transport, and depositional fairway.