Abstract

Meningeal tumors represent approximately 10–25% of primary brain tumors and occur usually in elderly female patients. Most meningiomas are benign (80–85%) and for symptomatic and/or large tumors, surgery, with or without radiation therapy (RT), has been long established as an effective means of local tumor control. RT can be delivered to inoperable lesions or to those with non-benign histology and for Simpson I–III and IV–V resection. RT can be delivered with photons or particles (protons or carbon ions) in stereotactic or non-stereotactic conditions. Particle therapy delivered for these tumors uses the physical properties of charged carbon ions or protons to spare normal brain tissue (i.e. Bragg peak), with or without or a dose-escalation paradigm for non-benign lesions. PT can substantially decrease the dose delivered to the non-target brain tissues, including but not limited to the hippocampi, optic apparatus or cochlea. Only a limited number of meningioma patients have been treated with PT in the adjuvant or recurrent setting, as well as for inoperable lesions with pencil beam scanning and with protons only. Approximately 500 patients with image-defined or WHO grade I meningioma have been treated with protons. The reported outcome, usually 5-year local tumor control, ranges from 85 to 99% (median, 96%). For WHO grade II or III patients, the outcome of only 97 patients has been published, reporting a median tumor local control rate of 52% (range, 38–71.1). Only 24 recurring patients treated previously with photon radiotherapy and re-treated with PT were reported. The clinical outcome of these challenging patients seems interesting, provided that they presented initially with benign tumors, are not in the elderly category and have been treated previously with conventional radiation dose of photons. Overall, the number of meningioma patients treated or-re-irradiated with this treatment modality is small and the clinical evidence level is somewhat low (i.e. 3b–5). In this review, we detail the results of upfront PT delivered to patients with meningioma in the adjuvant setting and for inoperable tumors. The outcome of meningioma patients treated with this radiation modality for recurrent tumors, with or without previous RT, will also be reviewed.

Highlights

  • Meningiomas are the commonest primary brain tumor and account for 10–25% of all cases [1]

  • All these patients presented with WHO grade II (n = 1) and III (n = 2) meningiomas and were retreated with 51 GyRBE delivered with carbon ions after an initial photon dose delivery of 54, 60 and 60 Gy, respectively

  • Regarding the former, a systematic review of 11 published series assessing the impact of surgery on the cognitive functioning of meningioma patients observed that most of these patients suffer from deficits in several cognitive domains comparative to the normative values [34]

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Meningiomas are the commonest primary brain tumor and account for 10–25% of all cases [1]. For non-SFPT/pSRS series, the Paul Scherrer Institute recently published the results of 61 WHO grade I meningioma patients treated with pencil beam scanning PT to a median dose of 54 GyRBE (Table 1) [22]. For those patients progressing/recurring, most of them failed within the treatment field. Three (7.1%) patients presented with radiation-induced brain necrosis All these patients presented with WHO grade II (n = 1) and III (n = 2) meningiomas and were retreated with 51 GyRBE delivered with carbon ions after an initial photon dose delivery of 54, 60 and 60 Gy, respectively. No death resulting from this re-irradiation with protons was observed

Findings
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.