Abstract

AbstractProton spin diffusion studies for characterizing minimum domain dimensions have been carried out on three blends: a 40/60 blend of nylon 6,6 with the aromatic rigid rod polymer poly(benzo[a,d]dithiazol‐2,6‐diyl‐1,4‐phenylene), PBZT, a 47/53 blend of an amorphous nylon with PBZT, and a 50/50 blend of a polyetherimide (PEI) and a polybenzimidazole (PBI). Polarization gradients necessary for these experiments were generated using both chemical shift differences (via multiple pulse techniques) and linewidth differences. Polarization readout techniques included proton lineshape deconvolution, multiple pulse proton lineshapes and 13C CPMAS spectra utilizing short CP times. The two nylon/PBZT blends are expected to phase separate from thermodynamic arguments; however, kinetic considerations, more than thermodynamics, determine domain size. In the 40/60 blend, the minimum domain dimensions of each of the nylon and the PBZT phases were about 4 nm with some scattered larger crystals of nylon. In the 47/53 blend, mixing in some regions indicated domain dimensions similar to the 40/60 blend. In contrast to the 40/60 blend, however, the 47/53 blend was still far from internal spin polarization equilibrium after spin diffusion times of 140 ms. The implication is that the sample‐average composition is not found over dimensions like 40 nm; the problem is that the possible morphological explanations are manifold. By investigating the proton rotating frame relaxation, T1p, the possibility that some of the PBZT domains are isolated from the nylon, in a spin diffusion sense, was eliminated. It is more likely that about half of the nylon protons are isolated by spin diffusion from the PBZT protons on a 140 ms timescale. The PEI/PBI blend is a compatible blend of two aromatic polymers where mixing on a molecular scale is expected. We were interested in a measurement of the lower limit of domain size using proton spin diffusion. This lower limit turned out to be about 2.5 nm based on low temperature T1p measurements as opposed to room temperature multiple pulse methods. The latter measurements monitored the disappearance of a polarization gradient between the PEI methyl protons and all the remaining protons. The superiority of the T1p measurements over the multiple pulse method for establishing the smaller minimum domain dimension is not a general result and reasons are discussed. Finally, some general remarks about characterizing polymer blends by solid state NMR, particularly blends which have undergone spinodal phase separation, are included.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call