Abstract

PurposeTo test our hypothesis that, for young children with intracranial tumors, proton radiotherapy in a high-income country does not reduce the risk of a fatal subsequent malignant neoplasm (SMN) compared with photon radiotherapy in low- and middle-income countries.Materials and MethodsWe retrospectively selected 9 pediatric patients with low-grade brain tumors who were treated with 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy in low- and middle-income countries. Images and contours were deidentified and transferred to a high-income country proton therapy center. Clinically commissioned treatment planning systems of each academic hospital were used to calculate absorbed dose from the therapeutic fields. After fusing supplemental computational phantoms to the patients' anatomies, models from the literature were applied to calculate stray radiation doses. Equivalent doses were determined in organs and tissues at risk of SMNs, and the lifetime attributable risk of SMN mortality (LAR) was predicted using a dose-effect model. Our hypothesis test was based on the average of the ratios of LARs from proton therapy to that of photon therapy ResultsProton therapy reduced the equivalent dose in organs at risk for SMNs and LARs compared with photon therapy for which the for the cohort was 0.69 ± 0.10, resulting in the rejection of H0 (P < .001, α = 0.05). We observed that the younger children in the cohort (2-4 years old) were at a factor of approximately 2.5 higher LAR compared with the older children (8-12 years old). ConclusionOur findings suggest that proton radiotherapy has the strong potential of reducing the risk of fatal SMNs in pediatric patients with intracranial tumors if it were made available globally.

Highlights

  • High long-term survival rates and sensitivity to long-term radiogenic effects for children with cancer necessitate research of late effects from cancer treatment

  • Proton therapy is becoming the modality of choice for pediatric patients with cancers of the central nervous system, which comprise 48% of all pediatric proton treatments [2]

  • Virtual trial, we tested the hypothesis that no improvement in minimizing the risk of a fatal subsequent malignant neoplasm (SMN) would result from treating pediatric patients with intracranial tumors with proton therapy in an high-income country (HIC) rather than photon therapy in an low- and middle-income countries (LMICs)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

High long-term survival rates and sensitivity to long-term radiogenic effects for children with cancer necessitate research of late effects from cancer treatment. For children of ages 14 years and younger who have cancer, the 5-year survival rates have been reported to be 84% in the United States [1], a high-income country (HIC). One promising treatment to reduce the risk of late effects for these children globally is proton radiotherapy. Proton therapy is becoming the modality of choice for pediatric patients with cancers of the central nervous system, which comprise 48% of all pediatric proton treatments [2]. 80% of children with cancer live in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), with very limited access to proton therapy [3]. It has been suggested that these patients could benefit from regional proton centers [4, 5]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call