Proton conductivity study on three CS/IL@fle‐MOF membranes

Abstract

The low‐cost, high specific surface area and porosity, controlled pore size, and chemical properties of metal–organic framework (MOF) materials have attracted much attention in the exploration of proton conduction. The method of chemically modifying MOF structures or introducing conductive medium into the holes can effectively improve the proton conductivities of the materials. Here, the structural tunability of ionic liquid (IL) and flexible MOF (fle‐MOF) materials are matched to give full play to the conductivity of IL, the framework support, and the microporous effect of MOFs, which achieves the synergistic effect of performance and expands the temperature range of proton transfer. Three kinds of CS/IL@fle‐MOF membranes were prepared by combining three fle‐MOFs with 1‐carboxymethyl‐3‐methylimidazole (CMMIM) in different proportions to obtain 15 pieces of membranes. The comparative analyses show that CS/IL@fle‐MOF membranes have excellent proton conduction performance at a wider temperature range (263–353 K) and lower relative humidity (75% RH). Among them, the proton conductivities of CS/CMMIM@MIL‐88A‐25% and CS/CMMIM@MIL‐88B‐125% are up to 1.33 and 1.42 S cm−1 at 75% RH and 353 K, respectively; whereas those of CS/CMMIM@MIL‐53(Fe)‐75% and CS/CMMIM@MIL‐88B‐125% reach up to 2.1 × 10−3 and 1.28 × 10−3 S cm−1 at 75% RH and 263 K, respectively. The Ea of CS/CMMIM@fle‐MOFs is in the range of 0.1–0.5 eV, suggesting that the proton transport follows predominantly the typical Grotthuss transfer mechanism. The results of this study indicate that the CS/CMMIM@fle‐MOF membranes combinations offer great potential for the design of composite porous proton‐conducting materials.