Abstract

The rms-radius R of the proton charge distribution is a fundamental quantity needed for precision physics. This radius, traditionally determined from elastic electron-proton scattering via the slope of the Sachs form factor G e ( q 2 ) extrapolated to momentum transfer q 2 = 0 , shows a large scatter. We discuss the approaches used to analyze the e-p data, partly redo these analyses in order to identify the sources of the discrepancies and explore alternative parameterizations. The problem lies in the model dependence of the parameterized G ( q ) needed for the extrapolation. This shape of G ( q < q m i n ) is closely related to the shape of the charge density ρ ( r ) at large radii r, a quantity that is ignored in most analyses. When using our physics knowledge about this large-r density together with the information contained in the high-q data, the model dependence of the extrapolation is reduced, and different parameterizations of the pre-2010 data yield a consistent value for R = 0.887 ± 0.012 fm. This value disagrees with the more precise value 0.8409 ± 0.0004 fm determined from the Lamb shift in muonic hydrogen.

Highlights

  • The interest in the root-mean-square radius R of the proton charge distribution is twofold: First, R is an integral quantity that characterizes the size of an elementary particle, the proton.Second, an accurate value for R is required in order to precisely calculate transition energies in the hydrogen atom, needed in connection with the definition of fundamental constants, the Rydberg constant in particular [1], and precision tests of QED

  • When using our physics knowledge about this large-r density together with the information contained in the high-q data, the model dependence of the extrapolation is reduced, and different parameterizations of the pre-2010 data yield a consistent value for R = 0.887 ± 0.012 fm

  • From electron scattering disagrees with the more precise value from muonic hydrogen, 0.8409 ± 0.0004 fm [3,4,5]; the comparison to the radius from electronic hydrogen [6,7] is not yet conclusive. This so-called “proton radius puzzle” has generated an extensive discussion ranging from a reevaluation of the uncertainties of R from the determination via electron scattering to understanding the difference in terms of new physics

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The interest in the root-mean-square (rms) radius R of the proton charge distribution is twofold: First, R is an integral quantity that characterizes the size of an elementary particle, the proton. The value of R from electron scattering (a recent compilation listed 0.879 ± 0.009 fm [2]) disagrees with the more precise value from muonic hydrogen, 0.8409 ± 0.0004 fm [3,4,5]; the comparison to the radius from electronic hydrogen [6,7] is not yet conclusive. This so-called “proton radius puzzle” has generated an extensive discussion ranging from a reevaluation of the uncertainties of R from the determination via electron scattering to understanding the difference in terms of new physics. We will summarize the situation on the determination of R via electron-proton scattering and provide a critical analysis of the extractions of R described in the literature; in some cases, we repeat analogous determinations to better understand the origins of discrepant results

Electron Scattering
Charge Radius and Density
Peculiarities and Difficulties
Parameterizations in q-Space Only?
R from Very-Low-q Data?
A Counter-Intuitive Observation
Parameterizations and Fits
Types of Parameterizations Used
Polynomials in q
Inverse-Polynomial Type
Polynomial in ξ Times Dipole
R from Bayesian Inference
Vector Dominance Model Fits
VDM-Motivated Parameterizations
Laguerre Polynomial Fits
6.10. Sum-Of-Gaussians with Tail Constraint
Findings
Summary

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.