Abstract

PROTOCOL: Accommodation-based interventions for individuals experiencing, or at risk of experiencing, homelessness.

Highlights

  • Interventions included in this review are those which primarily seek to meet the user's accommodation needs through provision of a short‐term shelter and bed or a long‐term home

  • These interventions may be provided alongside additional support and services

  • Emerging themes were collated, and reviewers communicated to better understand the patterns which appeared through the sampled studies. Through this iterative process we conclude that the most suitable way to create meaningful categorisations would be based around the intensity of the intervention and the expectations posited to the client during it as there was significant diversity in approaches taken

Read more

Summary

| BACKGROUND

Homelessness affects individuals who are experiencing life without safe, adequate or stable housing. Interventions included in this review are those which primarily seek to meet the user's accommodation needs through provision of a short‐term shelter and bed or a long‐term home These interventions may be provided alongside additional support and services. Emerging themes were collated, and reviewers communicated to better understand the patterns which appeared through the sampled studies Through this iterative process we conclude that the most suitable way to create meaningful categorisations would be based around the intensity (defined as the level of the support offered) of the intervention and the expectations posited to the client during it as there was significant diversity in approaches taken. Differences in outcomes of interest Fitzpatrick‐Lewis et al (2011) conducted a rapid systematic review on the effectiveness of interventions to improve the health and housing status of individuals experiencing homeless which located 84 relevant studies. Through synthesis of the available and most robust research, this review will provide the best estimation of reality, by combining more data than a primary research study feasibly could

| OBJECTIVES
| METHODS
Bibliographic information
Cannot tell
Receiving treatment
Intervention information
Randomised control trial
Method of assignment
Regression discontinuity design
Qualitative information
11. Was the allocation sequence random?
21. Were participants aware of their assigned intervention during the trial?
41. Was the method of measuring the outcome inappropriate?
Unpredictable
52. Were participants excluded due to missing data on intervention status?
63. Were the methods of outcome assessment comparable across intervention groups?
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call