Abstract

Proterozoic silicic magmatic activity in the Tennant Creek area includes a suite of pre- to syn-orogenic granitoids (i.e. the Tennant Creek Granite and compositionally similar porphyries) predominantly intruded during the period 1870–1830 Ma, a group of silicic volcanics and volcaniclastics (Flynn Subgroup) erupted shortly after the main D1 deformation, and apparently anorogenic silicic intrusives represented by the Warrego Granite. Chemical and petrographic data indicate that the majority of the pre- to syn-orogenic granitoids and porphyries are I-type or infracrustal-derived, whereas the peraluminous muscovite-rich Warrego Granite has many characteristics of supracrustal-derived (S-type) granitoids. The Warrego Granite also appears to be moderately fractionated with relatively low Ba, Sr, Zr, K/Rb, and high Th, Nb, Be, Bi, Rb/Sr compared with the associated I-type granitoids, porphyries and volcanics. Fractionation of feldspar and minor zircon has also resulted in substantial relative enrichment in LREE together with a pronounced negative Eu anomaly in the Warrego Granite. Previous studies suggest that the Cu-Au-Bi mineralisation at Tennant Creek post-dates formation of the host ironstones, but the absolute timing is imprecisely known. Mass-balance calculations utilising background Au concentrations for potential source rocks suggest it is feasible for the Au in some of the deposits to have been leached by relatively high-temperature (250 to 300 °C) deep basinal brines, and deposited by reaction with the ironstones. However, the inferred hydrothermal leaching cells would need to have been very large unless the leaching process was very effective. An alternative preferred model is that the mineralising fluids were exsolved from incompatible element-enriched, fractionated granitic magma, mixed with ground water, and reacted with the ironstones to deposit the base and precious metals. On the basis of chemical similarity to other granitoids closely associated with mineralisation, the Warrego Granite seems the most likely source of the fluids. However, problematic constraints imposed by the apparent age of the mineralisation (1810 Ma), and an emplacement age (Rb-Sr) of 1670 Ma for the Warrego Granite indicate a need for additional geochronological studies.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call