Abstract

Shipboard experiments were each performed over a 2 day period to examine the proteomic response of the symbiotic coral Acropora microphthalma exposed to acute conditions of high temperature/low light or high light/low temperature stress. During these treatments, corals had noticeably bleached. The photosynthetic performance of residual algal endosymbionts was severely impaired but showed signs of recovery in both treatments by the end of the second day. Changes in the coral proteome were determined daily and, using recently available annotated genome sequences, the individual contributions of the coral host and algal endosymbionts could be extracted from these data. Quantitative changes in proteins relevant to redox state and calcium metabolism are presented. Notably, expression of common antioxidant proteins was not detected from the coral host but present in the algal endosymbiont proteome. Possible roles for elevated carbonic anhydrase in the coral host are considered: to restore intracellular pH diminished by loss of photosynthetic activity, to indirectly limit intracellular calcium influx linked with enhanced calmodulin expression to impede late-stage symbiont exocytosis, or to enhance inorganic carbon transport to improve the photosynthetic performance of algal symbionts that remain in hospite. Protein effectors of calcium-dependent exocytosis were present in both symbiotic partners. No caspase-family proteins associated with host cell apoptosis, with exception of the autophagy chaperone HSP70, were detected, suggesting that algal loss and photosynthetic dysfunction under these experimental conditions were not due to host-mediated phytosymbiont destruction. Instead, bleaching occurred by symbiont exocytosis and loss of light-harvesting pigments of algae that remain in hospite. These proteomic data are, therefore, consistent with our premise that coral endosymbionts can mediate their own retention or departure from the coral host, which may manifest as “symbiont shuffling” of Symbiodinium clades in response to environmental stress.

Highlights

  • EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURESCoral Collection and Experimental Design—A large colony of Acropora microphthalma [21] was selected from a depth of 12.7 m (mid tide) at Davies Reef in the central region of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia (147° 37.778Ј E : 18° 49.270Ј S)

  • From the ‡King’s College London Proteomics Facility, Institute of Psychiatry, London SE5 8AF, UK. §Centre for Marine Microbiology and Genetics, Australian Institute of Marine Science, PMB No 3 Townsville MC, Townsville, Queensland,4810 Australia. ¶ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville QLD 4811 Australia. ‡‡Section for Bioinformatics, Department of Biochemical Engineering, Faculty of Food Technology & Biotechnology, University of Zagreb, Pierottijeva 6, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia. ࿣Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, Kings College, Strand, London WC2R 2LS, United Kingdom, **Department of Chemistry, King’s College Strand, London WC2R 2LS, United Kingdom, Franklin-Wilkins Building, Stamford Street, London SE1 9NH, UK

  • The peptide-fold changes were massive in day 1 as compared with the unstressed t ϭ 0 proteome in the high light/low temperature treatment, but these changes collapsed by day 2 for all but a few detectable peptides

Read more

Summary

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Coral Collection and Experimental Design—A large colony of Acropora microphthalma [21] was selected from a depth of 12.7 m (mid tide) at Davies Reef in the central region of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia (147° 37.778Ј E : 18° 49.270Ј S). Time points t ϭ 1 and t ϭ 2 (high light with high temperature treatment) were normalized according to the reference sample in tube 1. A separate PERL script was used to take averages of the same TMT intensity ratios for each MS/MS event assigned to the same protein in the high light with low temperature and low light with high temperature treatments. A PERL script was used to take averages of the normalized tag intensities for each MS/MS event assigned to the same protein in the high light with high temperature treatment. The ratios of the averaged TMT intensities for the high light with high temperature treatment were calculated from the resulting Excel file This enabled a calculation of fold changes per annotated protein between the three time points for each of the three conditions

RESULTS
Low light high temperature
BLASTp score
DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call