Protein synthesis in japanese encephalitis virus-infected cells

Abstract

We studied the effects of actinomycin D, cycloheximide, and puromycin on virus-specified protein synthesis in Japanese encephalitis (JE) virus-infected chick embryo and LLC-MK 2 (rhesus monkey kidney) cells. To prove that the radioactively labeled proteins we had previously identified in infected chick cells were virus-specified, we showed that they electrophoretically comigrated with radioactively labeled proteins from infected, but not from uninfected, LLC-MK 2 cells. We found that the maximum value for the ratio of protein synthesis in infected chick cells to uninfected cells occurred when the cells were treated with actinomycin D and were pulse-inhibited with cycloheximide. Alone, actinomycin D treatment decreased the background radioactivity of high molecular weight in electropherograms of infected chick cells and allowed virus-specified proteins to be prominent. Cycloheximide pulse-inhibition of infected, actinomycin D-treated cells decreased total cellular protein synthesis and slightly decreased the background radioactivity in electropherograms without changing the distribution of radioactivity among virus-specified proteins. Neither drug treatment decreased the yield of infectious virus. These results differ in some respects from the related results of Trent and Qureshi (1971). In contrast to our results with cycloheximide, pulse-inhibition of infected chick embryo cells with puromycin inhibited the synthesis of polypeptides NV-5, NV-4, and NV-1 (virus-specified nonstructural, nonglycosylated proteins) to a greater extent than that of V-3, NV-3, NV-2, and V-2 (virus-specified glycosylated and/or structural proteins). It also generally inhibited the synthesis of large proteins relative to small ones. We then studied the effects of puromycin and cycloheximide in LLC-MK 2 cells. In contrast to our results in chick embryo cells, pulse-inhibition of infected LLC-MK 2 cells with either drug (in the continuous presence of actinomycin D) did not alter the pattern of virus-specified proteins in electropherograms from that obtained without pulse-inhibition. Treatment with continuous levels of either drug (in the presence of actinomycin D) did, however, alter the protein pattern by differentially inhibiting the synthesis of nonstructural, nonglycosylated proteins. By labeling infected cells with one of eight different amino acids, we were unable to find an unusually enriched (or lowered) amino acid content that was common to all nonstructural, nonglycosylated proteins. A possible explanation for the differential inhibition is that the virus directs the formation of functionally different polyribosomes, messengers, or initiation factors which vary in their susceptibility to low levels of inhibitors of protein synthesis.