Abstract

BackgroundProtein secondary structure prediction (SSP) has been an area of intense research interest. Despite advances in recent methods conducted on large datasets, the estimated upper limit accuracy is yet to be reached. Since the predictions of SSP methods are applied as input to higher-level structure prediction pipelines, even small errors may have large perturbations in final models. Previous works relied on cross validation as an estimate of classifier accuracy. However, training on large numbers of protein chains compromises the classifier ability to generalize to new sequences. This prompts a novel approach to training and an investigation into the possible structural factors that lead to poor predictions.Here, a small group of 55 proteins termed the compact model is selected from the CB513 dataset using a heuristics-based approach. In a prior work, all sequences were represented as probability matrices of residues adopting each of Helix, Sheet and Coil states, based on energy calculations using the C-Alpha, C-Beta, Side-chain (CABS) algorithm. The functional relationship between the conformational energies computed with CABS force-field and residue states is approximated using a classifier termed the Fully Complex-valued Relaxation Network (FCRN). The FCRN is trained with the compact model proteins.ResultsThe performance of the compact model is compared with traditional cross-validated accuracies and blind-tested on a dataset of G Switch proteins, obtaining accuracies of ∼81 %. The model demonstrates better results when compared to several techniques in the literature. A comparative case study of the worst performing chain identifies hydrogen bond contacts that lead to Coil ⇔ Sheet misclassifications. Overall, mispredicted Coil residues have a higher propensity to participate in backbone hydrogen bonding than correctly predicted Coils.ConclusionsThe implications of these findings are: (i) the choice of training proteins is important in preserving the generalization of a classifier to predict new sequences accurately and (ii) SSP techniques sensitive in distinguishing between backbone hydrogen bonding and side-chain or water-mediated hydrogen bonding might be needed in the reduction of Coil ⇔ Sheet misclassifications.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12859-016-1209-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • Protein secondary structure prediction (SSP) has been an area of intense research interest

  • The choice of feature encoding likely plays a role in the better results shown by Secondary structure prediction with 55 training proteins (SSP55) and FLOPRED since both have used energy based feature representation in comparison to other methods employing position specific scoring matrices (PSSM)

  • The better results obtained by SSP55 over SSPCV indicate that the choice of training proteins is highly important to preserve the generalization ability of the classifier and that, it is not necessary that a larger number of training proteins is a guarantee of good performance

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Protein secondary structure prediction (SSP) has been an area of intense research interest. Since the predictions of SSP methods are applied as input to higher-level structure prediction pipelines, even small errors may have large perturbations in final models. Training on large numbers of protein chains compromises the classifier ability to generalize to new sequences. This prompts a novel approach to training and an investigation into the possible structural factors that lead to poor predictions. A small group of 55 proteins termed the compact model is selected from the CB513 dataset using a heuristics-based approach. The subsequent deposition of structures into public databases aided growth of methods predicting structures from protein sequences. The existing SSP methods are briefly summarized by developments that led to increases in accuracy and grouped by algorithms employed

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call