Abstract

BackgroundHighly repetitive sequences are the bane of genome sequence assembly, and the short read lengths produced by current next generation sequencing technologies further exacerbates this obstacle. An adopted practice is to exclude repetitive sequences in genome data assembly, as the majority of repeats lack protein-coding genes. However, this could result in the exclusion of important genotypes in newly sequenced non-model species. The absence of the antifreeze glycoproteins (AFGP) gene family in the recently sequenced Atlantic cod genome serves as an example.ResultsThe Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) genome was assembled entirely from Roche 454 short reads, demonstrating the feasibility of this approach. However, a well-known major adaptive trait, the AFGP, essential for survival in frigid Arctic marine habitats was absent in the annotated genome. To assess whether this resulted from population difference, we performed Southern blot analysis of genomic DNA from multiple individuals from the North East Arctic cod population that the sequenced cod belonged, and verified that the AFGP genotype is indeed present. We searched the raw assemblies of the Atlantic cod using our G. morhua AFGP gene, and located partial AFGP coding sequences in two sequence scaffolds. We found these two scaffolds constitute a partial genomic AFGP locus through comparative sequence analyses with our newly assembled genomic AFGP locus of the related polar cod, Boreogadus saida. By examining the sequence assembly and annotation methodologies used for the Atlantic cod genome, we deduced the primary cause of the absence of the AFGP gene family from the annotated genome was the removal of all repetitive Roche 454 short reads before sequence assembly, which would exclude most of the highly repetitive AFGP coding sequences. Secondarily, the model teleost genomes used in projection annotation of the Atlantic cod genome have no antifreeze trait, perpetuating the unawareness that the AFGP gene family is missing.ConclusionsWe recovered some of the missing AFGP coding sequences and reconstructed a partial AFGP locus in the Atlantic cod genome, bringing to light that not all repetitive sequences lack protein coding information. Also, reliance on genomes of model organisms as reference for annotating protein-coding gene content of a newly sequenced non-model species could lead to omission of novel genetic traits.

Highlights

  • Repetitive sequences are the bane of genome sequence assembly, and the short read lengths produced by current generation sequencing technologies further exacerbates this obstacle

  • antifreeze glycoproteins (AFGP) gene family in Atlantic cod To experimentally verify the presence of the AFGP genotype in the North East Arctic cod (NEAC) and Norwegian coastal cod (NCC), used for genome sequencing and BAC library support respectively [3], we performed Southern blot analysis of genomic DNA of multiple individuals from these two populations (Figure 1)

  • We identified them as NEAC or NCC based on the specimen’s pantophysin I (PanI) genotype, the accepted marker for distinguishing the two stocks [11,12,13]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Repetitive sequences are the bane of genome sequence assembly, and the short read lengths produced by current generation sequencing technologies further exacerbates this obstacle. An adopted practice is to exclude repetitive sequences in genome data assembly, as the majority of repeats lack protein-coding genes. This could result in the exclusion of important genotypes in newly sequenced non-model species. All excluding what appears to be simple repetitive sequences could result in the exclusion of an important fitness genotype, in the case of the Atlantic cod genome. While not the focus of the discussion, it is surprising that a crucial fitness trait, the antifreeze glycoprotein (AFGP) [4,5,6], which has clear relevance for aquaculture of the species in cold, northerly latitudes, was absent from genome annotations and predicted transcripts and proteins. Neither was any allusion made to its presence in the extensive Supplementary Notes accompanying the report

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call