Abstract

BackgroundGamma (γ) ray, an electromagnetic radiation, is occasionally accompanying the emission of an alpha or beta particle. Exposure to such radiation can cause cellular changes such as mutations, chromosome aberration and cellular damage which depend upon the total amount of energy, duration of exposure and the dose. Ionizing radiation can impair spermatogenesis and can cause mutations in germ cells. In general, type B spermatogonia are sensitive to this type of radiation. The current study was carried out to evaluate the protective role of hesperidin (H), as a polyphenolic compound, on rat testis injury induced by γ-radiation.MethodsRats were divided into groups including C group (control rats), R (irradiated) group (rats irradiated with γ-radiation), Vehicle (V) group (rats administered with dimethylsulfoxide “DMSO”), H group (rats administered with H only), HR and RH groups (rats treated with H before and after exposure to γ-radiation, respectively). Malondialdehyde (MDA: the end product of lipid peroxidation “LPO”) and xanthine oxidase (XO: it generates reactive oxygen species “ROS”) in testes homogenate as well as nitric oxide (NO: as ROS) in mitochondrial matrix were determined. The apoptotic markers including DNA-fragmentation (DNAF) in testes homogenate and calcium ions (Ca2+) in mitochondrial matrix were determined. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) activities in testes homogenate, while reduced glutathione “GSH” in nuclear matrix were determined. Also histopathological examination for testes tissues through electron microscope was studied.ResultsExposure of rats to γ-radiation (R group) increased the levels of MDA, NO, DNAF, Ca2+ and XO activity, while it decreased GSH level, SOD and CAT activities as compared to the C groups; γ-radiation increased oxidative stress (OS), LPO, apoptosis and induced testes injuries. These results are in agreement with the histopathological examination. In contrast, treatment with H before or after exposure to γ-radiation (HR and RH groups, respectively) decreased the levels of MDA, NO, DNAF and Ca2+ but increased GSH level and the activities of SOD, CAT and XO as compared to R group and this indicates that H decreased OS, LPO and apoptosis. Also, the histopathological results showed that H improved testis architecture and this is related to the antioxidant and anti-apoptotic activities of H contents. Protection is more effective when H is given before rather than after exposure. Finally, administration of H to healthy rats for a short period had no adverse affect on testes cells.ConclusionHesperidin showed antioxidant and anti-apoptotic activities. It has a protective role against OS, injury and apoptosis induced by γ-radiation in testes. Protection is more effective when H is given before rather than after exposure.Graphical .

Highlights

  • Gamma (γ) ray, an electromagnetic radiation, is occasionally accompanying the emission of an alpha or beta particle

  • Effect of different doses of γ‐radiation on testicular DNAF and ultrastructure configuration The results showed that exposure of rats to γ-radiation in doses of 4, 6, 8 and 10 Gy, caused significant increases (p < 0.05) in DNAF by about 41.87, 85.12, 182.34 and 184.33%, respectively

  • These results showed that there were no significant differences in DNAF when compared exposure to 8 Gy and 10 Gy (p > 0.05)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Gamma (γ) ray, an electromagnetic radiation, is occasionally accompanying the emission of an alpha or beta particle. Exposure to such radiation can cause cellular changes such as mutations, chromosome aberration and cellular damage which depend upon the total amount of energy, duration of exposure and the dose. IR has many beneficial applications in medicine, industry and agriculture; it causes changes in the chemical balance of cells by direct and indirect actions. It may cause malignant changes and damage DNA leading to harmful genetic mutations that can be passed on to future generations [1]. Oxidative stress (OS) emerges when the production of ROS exceeds the capacity of cellular antioxidant defenses [4,5,6,7,8]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.