Protective properties of amino acids in liver preservation: effects of glycine and a combination of amino acids on anaerobic metabolism and energetics

Abstract

Background/Aims/Methods: In this study, we investigated the hepatoprotective effects of three storage solutions containing glycine (180 mM), glycylglycine (180 mM), and a mixture of 20 amino acids (combined concentration of 180 mM) on energy metabolism and levels of glucose and lactate (as an index of glycolytic flux) in rat livers. All effects were compared to those of livers flushed/stored with a modified University of Wisconsin solution. Results: Glycine-treatment showed no improvement in liver energetics (ATP, ADP, AMP) and lactate accumulation; this solution had the lowest buffering capacity of the four tested (approximately 30% of the University of Wisconsin solution). The glycylglycine solution had the highest buffering capacity of the four solutions tested (including University of Wisconsin solution). Complete titration of the glycine-, combined amino acids-, and University of Wisconsin solutions (from 8.0 to pH=6.0) resulted in a minor decrease in glycylglycine buffer pH; pH dropped by 0.2 pH units. In glycylglycine-treated livers, energetics showed an improvement over the first 1 h cold storage; ATP and ‘energy charge’ values remained high and ADP levels (and consequently total adenylate contents) were 0.7–2.4 μmol/g greater than livers stored in University of Wisconsin solution. A 2-fold increase in lactate accumulation suggested that the improvement in liver energetics for the glycylglycine buffer was due to maintained flux through glycolysis brought about by enhanced buffering capacity. The solution containing a combination of amino acids exhibited maximum maintenance of liver energetics via increased glycolytic flux, despite its slightly inferior buffering capacity (85% of University of Wisconsin solution). ATP levels were maintained over the first 2 h storage and ADP levles (and consequently, total adenylate contents) were 1.2–2.1 μmol/g greater than University of Wisconsin solution-treated livers during the entire 24 h storage period. Energy charge values for livers treated with the combination of amino acids were also significantly higher than with glycine-, glycylglycine- and University of Wisconsin solution-treatment; even at 24 h, energy charge was 0.36 (comparable to only 4 h storage in University of Wisconsin solution). Conclusions: Our data suggest that a combination of amino acids may be required for maximum protection of the liver, and furthermore there may be several independent mechanisms, including buffering capacity, responsible for cytoprotection of the liver during cold storage.