Abstract

AbstractSuperionic sulfide solid electrolytes (SEs) are of considerable interest for application in solid‐state batteries, but suffer from limited stability. When in combination with state‐of‐the‐art cathode active materials (CAMs), severe degradation at the CAM/SE interface occurs during electrochemical cycling. To improve upon the interfacial stability, inert coatings can be applied to the CAM particles, with the goal of preventing direct contact to the SE. In this study, different methods of depositing coatings, including hexagonal boron nitride, tungsten sulfide and exfoliated ((CH3(CH2)3)4N)4Nb6O17, in the form of nanosheets onto the free surface of a Ni‐rich LiNixCoyMnzO2 (NCM) CAM are examined and compared with one another. While dry coating is shown to produce relatively uniform coatings (good surface coverage), the secondary particle morphology of the NCM makes ball milling as a mechanical deposition method less attractive. In contrast, deposition from dispersions in organic solvents yields protective coatings with a lower degree of surface coverage. The different materials are electrochemically tested in liquid‐ and solid‐electrolyte‐based lithium‐ion batteries. A stabilizing effect from nanosheet coating is only observed for the cells with lithium thiophosphate SE.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call