Abstract

Memory CD4 T cells play a vital role in protection against re-infection by pathogens as diverse as helminthes or influenza viruses. Inducible costimulator (ICOS) is highly expressed on memory CD4 T cells and has been shown to augment proliferation and survival of activated CD4 T cells. However, the role of ICOS costimulation on the development and maintenance of memory CD4 T cells remains controversial. Herein, we describe a significant defect in the number of effector memory (EM) phenotype cells in ICOS−/− and ICOSL−/− mice that becomes progressively more dramatic as the mice age. This decrease was not due to a defect in the homeostatic proliferation of EM phenotype CD4 T cells in ICOS−/− or ICOSL−/− mice. To determine whether ICOS regulated the development or survival of EM CD4 T cells, we utilized an adoptive transfer model. We found no defect in development of EM CD4 T cells, but long-term survival of ICOS−/− EM CD4 T cells was significantly compromised compared to wild-type cells. The defect in survival was specific to EM cells as the central memory (CM) ICOS−/− CD4 T cells persisted as well as wild type cells. To determine the physiological consequences of a specific defect in EM CD4 T cells, wild-type and ICOS−/− mice were infected with influenza virus. ICOS−/− mice developed significantly fewer influenza-specific EM CD4 T cells and were more susceptible to re-infection than wild-type mice. Collectively, our findings demonstrate a role for ICOS costimulation in the maintenance of EM but not CM CD4 T cells.

Highlights

  • Memory CD4 T cells are a critical component of protective immunity to disease [1,2,3,4,5,6,7] as well as many pathological immune responses [8,9,10,11,12]

  • To determine whether Inducible costimulator (ICOS) might regulate the development or survival of memory CD4 T cells, we investigated the preexisting population of memory phenotype CD4 T cells in untreated ICOS2/2 and ICOSL2/2 mice compared to wild-type mice

  • There was no difference in central memory CD4 T cells and while there sometimes appeared to be a defect in the CM and Effector memory (EM) CD8 T cells in ICOS2/2 and ICOSL2/2 mice, it was neither as consistent nor as dramatic as the defect in ICOS2/2 EM CD4 T cells

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Memory CD4 T cells are a critical component of protective immunity to disease [1,2,3,4,5,6,7] as well as many pathological immune responses [8,9,10,11,12]. The survival and homeostatic proliferation of CM and EM CD4 T cells are regulated differently: CM CD4 T cells express higher levels of anti-apoptotic signaling molecules whereas EM CD4 T cells undergo greater levels of homeostatic proliferation [18,19]. These findings suggest that central and effector memory CD4 T cells occupy distinct niches

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call