Abstract

Sedentary behaviour is a major risk of mortality. However, data are contradictory regarding the effects of active commuting on mortality. To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of active commuting on mortality. The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Science Direct databases were searched for studies reporting mortality data and active commuting (walking or cycling) to or from work. We computed meta-analysis stratified on type of mortality, type of commuting, and level of commuting, each with two models (based on fully adjusted estimates of risks, and on crude or less adjusted estimates). 17 studies representing 829,098 workers were included. Using the fully adjusted estimates of risks, active commuting decreased all-cause mortality by 9% (95% confidence intervals 3-15%), and cardiovascular mortality by 15% (3-27%) (p < 0.001). For stratification by type of commuting, walking decreased significantly all-cause mortality by 13% (1-25%), and cycling decreased significantly both all-cause mortality by 21% (11-31%) and cardiovascular mortality by 33% (10-55%) (p < 0.001). For stratification by level of active commuting, only high level decreased all-cause mortality by 11% (3-19%) and both intermediate and high level decreased cardiovascular mortality. Low level did not decrease any type of mortality. Cancer mortality did not decrease with walking or cycling, and the level of active commuting had no effect. Low level walking did not decrease any type of mortality, intermediate level of walking decreased only all-cause mortality by 15% (2-28%), and high level of walking decreased both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality by 19% (8-30%) and by 31% (9-52%), respectively. Both low, intermediate and high intensities of cycling decreased all-cause mortality. Meta-analysis based on crude or less fully adjusted estimates retrieved similar results, with also significant reductions of cancer mortality with cycling (23%, 5-42%), high level of active commuting (14%, 4-24%), and high level of active commuting by walking (16%, 0-32%). Active commuting decreases mainly all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, with a dose-response relationship, especially for walking. Preventive strategies should focus on the benefits of active commuting.

Highlights

  • Sedentary lifestyle is a major public health problem [1,2,3]

  • Meta-analysis stratified by level of walking: Low level walking did not decrease any type of mortality, intermediate level of walking decreased only all-cause mortality by 15% (HR = 0.85, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.72 to 0.98), and high level of walking decreased both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality by 19% (0.81, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.92) and by 31% (0.69, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.91), respectively (Fig 3, and Electronic Supplementary Material Figs S7-S9)

  • Metaregressions failed to demonstrate best outcomes depending on type of mortality or level of active commuting – we report greater effect sizes for high levels of walking compared to low or intermediate levels

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Sedentary lifestyle is a major public health problem [1,2,3]. Physical inactivity is one of the leading causes of death in developed countries 4 increasing notably all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer mortality [5,6]. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effect of active commuting to or from work on mortality, stratified by type of mortality (all-cause, cardiovascular, cancer), type of active commuting (walking or cycling) and level (low, moderate and high). We computed meta-analysis stratified on type of mortality, type of commuting, and level of commuting, each with two models (based on fully adjusted estimates of risks, and on crude or less adjusted estimates). Cancer mortality did not decrease with walking nor cycling, and the level of active commuting had no effect. Meta-analysis based on crude or less fully adjusted estimates retrieved similar results, with significant reductions of cancer mortality with cycling (23%, 5 to 42%), high level of active commuting (14%, 4 to 24%), and high level of active commuting by walking (16%, 0 to 32%). Preventive strategies should focus on the benefits of active commuting

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call